Thursday, June 25, 2009
Farewell, Farrah. Do Blondes Really Have More Fun?
By Elise Nakhnikian
I'm not usually moved by by celebrity deaths, but the news of Farrah Fawcett's passing stabbed me with a shard of that sorrow and pity you feel when someone dies before they had a chance to fulfill their potential.
Strange way to think about someone who got so much more than her share of fame and attention, I know: That poster of her with the corkscrew curls and piano-key grin apparently sold several hundred thousand copies a month at the peak of her popularity. But I think the attention she got for her looks was like the poison in Sleeping Beauty's apple, freezing her in time and keeping her from developing her potential as an artist.
I say "artist" because I think that's how Farrah saw herself, at least when she was young. She studied art at UT in Austin before getting snatched up by the clanking maw of the entertainment machine, which promptly spat her out as the international symbol for California Girl and the original blonde on Charlie's Angels.
Amazingly, she was only on that show for one season, but she was identified with it and with that poster for the rest of her life, assumed to be a not-quite-real, none-too-bright has-been whose only claim to fame were a fortuitous combination of hair, teeth, and bone structure.
I met her in the early '80s. It must have been six or seven years after she'd escaped from the show, but she was still really prickly about it. I was living in her home town of Corpus Christi at the time, working for Corpus Christi Magazine, which sent me to interview her in New York where she was starring in an off-Broadway version of Extremities, a fairly simplistic but hard-hitting story of a woman who turns the tables on a rapist. Fawcett was really good in the part, much to everyone's surprise -- not that that helped her get many good parts afterward.
That wasn't the only thing about her that suprised me. She was smaller than I'd expected, as stars usually are, but she was also much stronger. Muscular and wiry, with ropy veins in her arms, she came off as an athlete, not a beauty queen.
She was clearly smart and funny, though she and I didn't laugh much. She was too busy countering the stereotypes everyone held about her. The article I wrote is in some box deep in my storage space and doesn't seem worth digging out at the moment, but I remember that one of the first things she said to me, maybe the first, was the phrase: "In my defense..." That was before I'd said a word, but I didn't need to: she knew what I was thinking.
People who knew I was going to interview her loved to show me how clever they were by asking things like "Find out who her dentist is." When I got back home and wrote an article that talked about how good she was in the play, another editor at the magazine added a snarky lead about how "Of course she'll never win a Tony." I fought to get that out of there, but they wouldn't let me eliminate that snide tone altogether. I won a journalism award for that piece, but I always felt like it was tainted by that faint undertone.
But hey, sneering at Farrah was just one of those things the smart set did back then: It proved you were in the know.
Lord knows I did it myself, when I was an alienated young hippie type and you couldn't escape that poster of hers. Aaron Spelling's now-ubiquitious brand of plasticine cheesecake was new then, so Charlie's Angels made a handy target for my friends and me, when we were bemoaning the death of the handmade and the heartfelt and all that other, less manufactured stuff we were so pleased with ourselves for appreciating.
I didn't learn much about Farrah when we met -- she'd had years by then to fill in the chinks in her armor -- but she gave me a lot to chew on afterward. You don't get looks like that without working at it, so some part of her must have enjoyed the attention her beauty earned her. But how frustrating it must have been to have dealt with all those stereotypes and sneers over the years. And what a shame that hardly anyone in the industry ever seemed to see what she was capable of as an actress.
Good on Robert Duvall for giving her that juicy part in the Apostle. She played the hell out of it, too.
Very touching, and also so true, if I am reading you correctly, that we (well, some of us) get more discerning - and often a bit more gentle - in how we apprise and judge people as we get older. I thought she was a bit of a caricature back then, but came to feel great sympathy for her, and am sad she lost her battle.
ReplyDeleteHow nice to read your insightful take on this -- so glad you posted this here.
ReplyDeleteI was also very saddened by Farrah's death. I had forgotten that she was in "The Apostle" - an amazing film. After "The Burning Bed," I no longer thought of her as just one of "Charlie's Angels."
ReplyDeleteToo bad she had to take second billing to the King of Pop. This is a nice tribute to her and true. And "The Apostle" is one of the great American films.
ReplyDeleteYOU PAID THE VERY BEST TRIBUTE TO DATE.
ReplyDeleteI am TEXAN,
It has greatly upset me that the tributes to this ICON of nature has not been paid.
I hope you may consider the revamping of te article ou did, and share more.
YOU DESERVE AN AWARD FOR THIS TRIBUTE ALONE.
As ROBER DUVALL said, FARRAH was his pick for that part in THE APOSTILE- Her part was cut to a mall old due to the personal EVEN THEN things she endured, BUT MR DUVALL ,WILL FIGHT ANYONE OVER HER ABILITY TO ACT ANY PART- In my opinion HOLLYWOOD IS NO LONGER- ELIZABETH TAYLOR REIGNS AS "DAME" and she is the last of THE MILL- But as foe A TEXAS BOY, FARRAH WILL ALWAYS BE CEMENTED AS THE ONE AND ONLY- AND SHEWILL LIVE ON AS TEXAN.
Greg
I think that as we (and Farrah) got older, we took things more seriously and we wanted to be taken seriously. Farrah did some great work. "The Burning Bed" made me see Farrah as more than a beautiful woman with a dazzling smile. I cried as I watched "Farrah's Story". I prayed for her and sent her a get well card. I wish she could have won her battle, but the lady gave it a hard fight. We will miss her.
ReplyDeleteI don't think this was a tribute at all. Are we all reading the same article??? The same undertone you spoke of in your article years ago still exists in this one. I think you said nice things but you judged her in the same sentences for being beautiful and for becoming famous for those attributes. Does anyone talk down on Cindy Crawford? She made a living on her looks and presence on the catwalk. There's nothing wrong with being beautiful. The only people who think it's wrong are those who aren't.
ReplyDelete